
Collaboration requires two or more people working together to achieve a shared goal. Library media specialists collaborate with educators to create authentic learning experiences for students by integrating information and technology literacy skills with classroom curriculum. The collaboration process includes planning, implementing and assessing instruction.

Collaboration
of Teachers/Library Media Specialists and Technology Specialists
http://www.indianalearns.org/collaborativespecial.asp
This image is
from the publication INDIANA LEARNS: INCREASING INDIANA STUDENT ACADEMIC
ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH SCHOOL LIBRARY MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS
David V.
Loertscher with Connie Champlin, 2002; ISBN: 0-931510-85-6
The terms cooperation, coordination and collaboration are often used interchangeably to describe collaborative relationships. An excerpt from the following article clarifies the differences between these three relationships.
From Collaboration: Lessons Learned by the American Association of School Librarians, a division of the American Library Association. Copyright © 1996 American Library Association. Reprinted with permission of the American Library Association.
Collaboration is essential for the successful integration of information skills instruction into curriculum subject areas. But collaboration is often used to mean cooperation or coordinating, and there’s a big difference among the three terms.
Cooperation is informal, with no commonly defined goals or planning effort; information is shared as needed (Mattessich and Monsey, 1992, p. 7). A library media specialist and teacher in a cooperative relationship work loosely together. Each works independently, but they come together briefly for mutual benefit.
Coordinating suggests a more formal working relationship and the understanding of missions. Some planning is required and more communication channels are established (Mattessich and Monsey, 1992, p. 7). In a library media program, the teacher and library media specialist make arrangements to plan and teach a lesson or unit, and a closer working relationship is required.
Collaboration is a much more prolonged and interdependent effort. As Winer and Ray (1994, p. 24) note, collaboration changes the way we work. Collaboration moves from:
n Competing to building consensus.
n Working alone to including others from different fields and backgrounds.
n Thinking mostly about activities and programs to thinking about larger results and strategies.
n Focusing on short-tem accomplishments to requiring long-term results.
The levels of collaboration, summarized by Winer and Ray (1994, p. 22), are found in the table below.
In summary, collaboration is a working relationship over a relarively long period of time. Collaboration requires shared goals, derived during the partnership. Roles are carefully defined, and more comprehensive planning is required. Communication is conducted at many levels to ensure success. Leadership, resources, risk, control and results are shared. As a result of collaboration, there is substantial benefit: “More is accomplished jointly than could have been individually.” (Mattessich and Monsey, 1992 p. 40).
|
Cooperation |
Coordination |
Collaboration |
|
Short
term Informal
relations No
clearly defined mission No
defined structure No
planning effort Partners
share information about the project at hand Individuals
retain authority Resources
are maintained separately No
risk Lower
intensity |
Longer
term More
formal relationships Understanding
mission Focus
on a specific effort or program Some
planning Open
communication channels Authority
still retained by individuals Resources
and rewards are shared Power
can be an issue Some
intensity |
Long
term More
pervasive relationship Commitment
to a common mission Results
in a new structure Comprehensive
planning Well
defined communication channels at all levels Collaborative
structure determines authority Resources
are shared Greater
risk; power is an issue Higher
intensity |
[back to Library Media Specialist's Toolbox] [back to Library Media Services]