Evaluation Criteria / Review Sheet

Use the table below to determine rating for each project component:

For Max of:

Excellent

Good

Average

Fair

Poor

Not Addressed

5

5

4

3

2

1

0

10

10

8

6

4

2

0

Points Awarded

Out of Maximum

I. Abstract

The abstract provides a concise description of the proposed project and rationale explaining why the proposal is a “Lighthouse Technology” project

10

II. Project Description

1

Describe the project proposal in detail and clearly link your proposal to the district goal, vision statement, and objectives as outlined on the grant announcement page

5

2

Identify the curriculum objectives your proposal addresses

5

3

Explain how teaching and learning will be improved

10

4

Describe expected student outcomes and measurable evidence that will demonstrate success.

10

5

How will your project be sustained when grant funding ends?

5

6

How will you share your efforts, so that it may be replicated or adapted by others?

5

III. Budget

1

Budget Narrative: Describe the items to be purchased and clearly link them to the project description and objectives. Explain how the items will be utilized by students and/or teachers. Indicate where there may be other costs, services, or modifications needed for full implementation of the grant; and specify the resources available to cover the amount required beyond the grant total, if applicable.

10

2

Budget Detail: Sufficient and accurate detail is provided

5

IV. Overall Quality

The project is well designed, of high quality, and is likely to contribute to system change in the West Hartford Public Schools.

15

Total Points Awarded This Proposal:

Total Points Possible:

80